http://www.berliner-mauer-kunst.net
|
Photography
as the content of memory - For the French sociologist
Pierre Bourdieu photography has the function of minimizing the anxiety that
the transience and temporality of human existence awakens in us. It is a
magical remainder for that which time has destroyed. It makes us believe that
we can wrest ourselves from its annihilating power. In addition, however,
photographic images become, not only for the photographer Günther Schaefer,
but also for Bordieu, something positive: memory aids and thus, in a
particular way, the historical documentary content of memory. In this sense,
who would be able to forgo them in their life? Documentary
photography aims, as the name says, at the image as document. It is convinced
of the importance of that which exists or occurs. It often, despite the
existence of color photography, deliberately arises from the pattern or coordinate system of
black-and-white. Reality is presented in a form of dual, bipolar program of
contrasts that at the same time recognizes a great many intermediate stages
and therefore nuances. At the same time it is not necessary, as it has
occurred in the history of photography – for example for the photographer
Umbo - Otto Umbehr - to still make this ideologically charged. That means to
argue that white is the good and black the bad, or indeed the evil. It
suffices to see this bipolar representation of reality as an analytical
relationship, meaning to associate interest with breaking down the world
analytically, and for a start to renounce acts of approval and disapproval. It is with this
attitude that the photographer Günther Schaefer, who, with his photos “ The photos, be it
the Wall images, be it the portraits, radiate a certain calm and dignity.
They are images that ensue after a decades long deep-seated horror, bearers
of a catharsis that still carries remnants of the political potential for
violence, which, fortunately, led to no explosively deadly results. They are
not however, understood in a more narrow sense, sentimental images. For this
purpose, this subjective documentarist, who goes beyond mere documentarism,
is much too analytical in his language of forms, which he rightly allows
himself, to impart an internal basis to the event through the discovery of a
predetermined, however only just discovered architectonics, and in doing so
gives the image cohesiveness and a measure of delight, without his action
simply disintegrating into mere exertion or work, without being accompanied
by appeasement. Also in the
selection of the one hundred and ten images and their arrangement, which only
seemingly proceed chronologically, Günther Schaefer shows himself to be a
photographer who combines chronology and composition, experience of great
social events in the now, since 1990, history of the whole Nevertheless, the
volume of photos is full of humor despite the solemnity of the majority of
the images: Thus the smile of a border guard who has shaken off the forced
robotic quality from his face, the joy of a GI on the hunt for a stone from
the Wall, the backs of Marx and Engels, a monument that had become all too cheapened
in the GDR, the Love Parade and the Carnival of Cultures, the veiling of the
Brandenburg Gate for renovation purposes. The ever ambiguous And finally the
pigeon on the memorial stone with the three-line text in capital letters,
“DEM UNBEKANNTEN FLÜCHTLING“ (the unknown escape victim), at the end of the
volume. The stone
dominates the image. It is positioned in the middle, trapezoidal in form,
without adhering to laws of geometry in its contours, and is gently flanked
from right and left by the two towers of the bridge Oberbaumbrücke, that appear in the background. Truncated at the
bottom, it towers aloft in this portrait format image, determining
three-fourths of the center of the image, and demands the viewer’s attention,
on the other hand the gaze is pulled to the beginning of the text directly
below the middle, yet is simultaneously drawn again towards the top to the
feature of this photo: to the pigeon whose feet stand exactly horizontal at
the middle of the space between the two towers, and at the same time are
suspended on the left half of the upper edge of the stone, an important
compositional element. The pigeon, with its body parallel to the stone, turns
its head almost front on to the photographer. With the bear and the eagle on
the two points of the towers it creates a sort of triangle and brings the
nature aspect of human existence into play, even when the bear and eagle have
been transformed into metal. Does the pigeon,
metaphysically speaking, constitute the return of the unknown escape victim?
Does the pigeon conceal the victim? Or does it sit there as a symbol of
peace, reminding of peace time and again? Or is it only an animal that for a
moment takes a rest from the restlessness, constantly on the search for
opportunities for nourishment? The pigeon will fly away, but the stone will
remain. Permanence and instant coincide for one second in the click of the
photographer. Documentary photos are not only defined by their motif but
instead are also form and hold the occasion recorded together in a particular
way. This is not the
place to analyze the images individually. The viewers however should immerse
themselves in each individual photo in order to find Günther Schaefer’s
particular design formula. This leads the viewer further into his vision and
perception. The photo thus becomes the lasting content of memory of the
historical contradictions that have developed in this city. Prof. Dr. Olav
Münzberg, University of the Arts (Universität der Künste, UdK) Urheberrecht / droit d’auteur / Copyright: Prof. Dr.
Olav Münzberg, Wilmersdorfer Str. 106, 10629 Phone : 049 / 30 / 324 23 41
, Fax: 31 99 73 58 , e-mail :
olav.muenzberg@t-online.de |